ComplicatedOrderDTO orderDTO = new ComplicatedOrderDTO(); ComplicatedOrderDO orderDO = new ComplicatedOrderDO(); orderDO.setAcceptDate(orderDTO.getAcceptDate()); orderDO.setAddress(orderDTO.getAddress()); orderDO.setAddressId(orderDTO.getAddressId()); orderDO.setCancelable(orderDTO.isCancelable()); orderDO.setCommentable(orderDTO.isComplainable()); //属性错误 orderDO.setComplainable(orderDTO.isCommentable()); //属性错误 orderDO.setCancelable(orderDTO.isCancelable()); orderDO.setCouponAmount(orderDTO.getCouponAmount()); orderDO.setCouponId(orderDTO.getCouponId()); orderDO.setCreateDate(orderDTO.getCreateDate()); orderDO.setDirectCancelable(orderDTO.isDirectCancelable()); orderDO.setDeliverDate(orderDTO.getDeliverDate()); orderDO.setDeliverGroup(orderDTO.getDeliverGroup()); orderDO.setDeliverGroupOrderStatus(orderDTO.getDeliverGroupOrderStatus()); orderDO.setDeliverMethod(orderDTO.getDeliverMethod()); orderDO.setDeliverPrice(orderDTO.getDeliverPrice()); orderDO.setDeliveryManId(orderDTO.getDeliveryManId()); orderDO.setDeliveryManMobile(orderDO.getDeliveryManMobile()); //对象错误如果不是代码中有注释,你能看出其中的诸多问题吗?如果原始的 DTO 有 100 个字段,我们需要复制 90 个字段到 DO 中,保留 10 个不赋值,最后应该如何校验正确性呢?数数吗?即使数出有 90 行代码,也不一定正确,因为属性可能重复赋值。
ComplicatedOrderDTO orderDTO = new ComplicatedOrderDTO(); ComplicatedOrderDO orderDO = new ComplicatedOrderDO(); BeanUtils.copyProperties(orderDTO, orderDO, "id"); return orderDO;
总结:
业务代码中常见的 DO、DTO、VO 转换时大量字段的手动赋值,遇到有上百个属性的复杂类型,非常非常容易出错。我的建议是,不要手动进行赋值,考虑使用 Bean 映射工具进行。此外,还可以考虑采用单元测试对所有字段进行赋值正确性校验。